Time horizons for nuclear materials development and qualification must be shortened to realize future nuclear energy concepts. Inspired by the Materials Genome Initiative, we present an integrated approach to materials discovery and qualification to insert new materials into service.
The world’s energy needs have grown alongside the rising population and are now greater than ever. Part of this growing energy demand is the electrification and modernization of aging infrastructure through clean, secure, and safe sources of energy1. Nuclear power can achieve these energy needs while meeting these high safety standards and, in support of these objectives, the U.S. Congress has mandated demonstrations of advanced reactor technology by 20302. Many advanced designs present more corrosive, hotter, and higher-irradiation environments than those in today’s nuclear reactor fleet, meaning potential new materials and processes must be developed in a timely manner. The final and crucial step of materials development is qualification, where it is determined that a fabricated part has the desired properties and that we know how these properties will evolve in the service environment.
While the timescale for materials design in other industries has been shortened to as low as three years3, nuclear materials development takes considerably longer and still relies on a largely iterative design cycle because of the need for irradiation experiments to understand in-reactor performance4. Irradiation profoundly impacts the evolution of material properties and this presents a significant barrier to qualifying new materials, as qualification remains based on insights into irradiation effects from historic large-scale qualification experiments and service experience with known materials5. This limited understanding of irradiation effects on materials has meant that efforts to successfully qualify and deploy innovative nuclear fuels and materials (e.g., TRISO fuels and advanced zirconium cladding alloys) take several sequential irradiation campaigns to complete, with each cycle lasting roughly a decade. However, there are a growing number of fuel system cladding concepts that have been developed in a single cycle (e.g., coated and iron-based claddings). This suggests change is possible with the adoption of a new development paradigm.
Generally, to develop new materials for nuclear energy applications, environmental and irradiation conditions must be correlated to materials’ evolution and degradation in service. Novel structural materials must mitigate embrittlement mechanisms and reduce void swelling and creep. Fuel cladding, which protects the fuel, must maintain structural integrity during normal operating conditions and accident scenarios. The fuel itself must not release fission products, must meet stringent thermal properties requirements, and must not chemically react the cladding and coolant. This effort requires strategic design and development of advanced materials, such as the creation of microstructures more resistant to irradiation by harnessing the properties of specific material defects.
Since materials remain in service for a number of years, effective irradiation modeling for qualification and performance prediction is just as critical to shorten the development timeline. An irradiation damage event occurs on the scale of picoseconds, resulting in a population of radiation-induced defects that remain after the damage event and evolve on timescales ranging from seconds to years. These defect populations may or may not reach a steady state, and further damage events can interact with those same defects. Bridging these time scales computationally will reduce the reliance on irradiation testing.
Modern experimental and modeling techniques including data analytics, high-throughput experiments, and machine learning, can be leveraged to provide these rapid advancements in nuclear energy and materials6. One way this is being achieved is through the Nuclear Materials Discovery and Qualification initiative (NMDQi), a comprehensive program spanning national laboratories, academia, and industry.
NMDQi was launched in 2020 led by Idaho National Laboratory to address the need for development of new nuclear materials on shorter timelines. As a national effort, NMDQi will demonstrate processes and test platforms for accelerated nuclear materials fuel development within the next 5 years, and qualification within the next 10 years.
NMDQi is broadly patterned after the Materials Genome Initiative (MGI)7, which seeks to overcome the time-intensive, costly, iterative processes of traditional, non-nuclear materials development. The MGI created the Materials Innovation Infrastructure (MII), a framework that relies on a tightly integrated iteration of computational and experimental tools, allowing for rapid prediction of materials’ properties and performance, and ultimately, the ability to design materials concurrently with the design of the product8. Unfortunately, the existing MII and available materials design tools often depend on large amounts of experimental and computational data, which are not usually available for nuclear materials.
Irradiation effects represent an especially data-poor problem. While prior and ongoing work in post-irradiation examination (PIE), in-pile testing, and radiography are valuable resources in addressing the issue of data scarcity, the tools and capabilities to leverage these rich and diverse datasets have yet to be fully realized under current programs. The introduction of NMDQi aims to bridge this gap, since it focuses on generating tools and capabilities that integrate experimental and computational techniques to allow materials to be selected prior to fabrication. It will also provide crucial data to improve upon modeling. Specific ways in which it will achieve these goals are listed below:
Several examples of materials-related areas to explore and improve upon include:
This work was supported in part through the Laboratory Directed Research & Development (LDRD) Program of Idaho National Laboratory under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID145142. The author(s) appreciate the support of James (Jim) Warren, Taylor Sparks, Stuart Malloy, and Christopher Stanek in providing valuable edits/suggestions, making this comment possible. The U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. This information was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe on privately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, etc., does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government or any agency thereof.
M.K. and R.A.R. contributed to the direction and edits. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the manuscript.