The peptidoglycan (PG) layer is an intricate and dynamic component of the bacterial cell wall, which requires a constant balance between its synthesis and hydrolysis. FtsEX complex present on the inner membrane is shown to transduce signals to induce PG hydrolysis. FtsE has sequence similarity with the nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs) of ABC transporters. The NBDs in most of the ABC transporters couple ATP hydrolysis to transport molecules inside or outside the cell. Also, this reaction cycle is driven by the dimerization of NBDs. Though extensive studies have been carried out on the Escherchia coli FtsEX complex, it remains elusive regarding how FtsEX complex helps in signal transduction or transportation of molecules. Also, very little is known about the biochemical properties and ATPase activities of FtsE. Because of its strong interaction with the membrane-bound protein FtsX, FtsE stays insoluble upon overexpression in E. coli, and thus, most studies on E. coli FtsE (FtsEEc) in the past have used refolded FtsE. Here in the present paper, for the first time, we report the soluble expression, purification, and biochemical characterization of FtsE from E. coli. The purified soluble FtsE exhibits high thermal stability, exhibits ATPase activity and has more than one ATP-binding site. We have also demonstrated a direct interaction between FtsE and the cytoplasmic loop of FtsX. Together, our findings suggest that during bacterial division, the ATPase cycle of FtsE and its interaction with the FtsX cytoplasmic loop may help to regulate the PG hydrolysis at the mid cell.
The bacterial cell division proceeds in two stages. In the first stage, chromosome segregation occurs, and in the second stage, the cell identifies the mid-cell position, where the division occurs. The constriction of cell envelope at the mid-cell assures the symmetric division of bacterial cells into two identical daughter cells. The reason for the occurrence of cytokinesis precisely at the mid-cell was unknown until the role of FtsZ in the assembly of the divisome was identified. FtsZ, a tubulin homolog, forms the core skeleton of the divisome by assembling into a ring-like structure at the mid-cell [1,2]. The two other essential cell division proteins, ZipA and FtsA help in stabilizing the Z-ring. FtsEX, an ABC transporter homolog , gets recruited to the Z-ring during the initial stages of the formation of the divisome complex [4,5]. In the FtsEX complex, FtsE forms the nucleotide-binding domain (NBD), and FtsX forms the transmembrane domain (TMD), and both are essential for the bacterial division. The ABC transporters primarily function as exporters or importers through remarkable conformational changes upon nucleotide-binding and hydrolysis. Apart from their role as a transporter, these family proteins help in the activation of other proteins . For example, FtsEX activates amidases through EnvC, which performs peptidoglycan (PG) hydrolysis during bacterial cytokinesis . Similar to other NBDs, FtsE possesses all the conserved regions, including the signature motifs, and the conserved residues involved in ATP-hydrolysis. The ATPase cycle is a necessary event for regulating the open and closed conformations of TMDs in ABC-transporters. Since TMD of the FtsEX complex is shorter, it may not show any open or closed conformations. Thus, if E. coli FtsE (FtsEEc) shows any ATPase cycle, it may regulate the PG hydrolysis pathway at the mid-cell by regulating FtsX.
During cell division, there is a continuous requirement of PG hydrolysis at the mid-cell, and a regulated mechanism is essential to avoid breaches due to uncontrolled PG hydrolysis. Hence, the ATPase cycle by FtsE could be an essential event for the on/off mechanism of PG hydrolysis. Thus, it becomes critical to characterize the presence of the ATPase cycle and NBD-like functions of FtsE. In this work, we have used biochemical approaches and homology modeling to describe the functional and structural aspects of FtsE and its features similar to the NBDs of ABC-transporter. To date, no studies have reported FtsEEc protein in the soluble fraction, and most of the works published are done with refolded protein. Here, we were able to purify FtsE from the soluble fraction and validate its function precisely.
HEPES, KCl, and sodium phosphate were from MP Biomedicals; LB broth and LB agar were from HiMedia, and MANT-ATP was from Invitrogen. All other chemicals used were of molecular biology grade and purchased from Sigma–Aldrich.
The ftsE ORF was cloned at EcoRI and SalI restriction sites into a His-pBAD18 plasmid after amplifying from E. coli K12 genomic DNA. The clones were confirmed through colony PCR, restriction digestion, and finally, with dsDNA sequencing. Point mutations were generated by inverse PCR mutagenesis in ftsE. The plasmid with point mutations was treated with DpnI enzyme and incubated overnight at 37°C. The DpnI-treated PCR product was transformed into E. coli DH5α cells, and the mutations were confirmed by dsDNA sequencing.
The plasmid with wildtype and mutant ftsE were transformed into E. coli C41 competent cells. Initially, the expression was checked with different percentages of arabinose, starting from 0.01 to 0.1% in LB broth, which was followed by checking the protein in the soluble fraction. A good amount of protein was obtained in the soluble fraction with 0.01% arabinose. So, a maxi-culture was performed using the same arabinose concentration. Maxi-culture was performed by inoculating the overnight culture into 1 liter of fresh LB broth and incubated at 30°C in a shaker incubator till the OD600 reached 0.5. The protein expression was induced with 0.01% of arabinose at 16°C in shaker incubator for 16 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 7000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C and resuspended with lysis buffer [25 mM sodium phosphate (pH 8.0), 300 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.01% NP-40 and 10% glycerol]. The suspended cells were homogenized with glass homogenizer for 1 h in ice and then passed through a pressure cell homogenizer four to five times. The cell lysate was then centrifuged at 40000×g for 2 h. The clarified supernatant was incubated with pre-equilibrated Ni-NTA resin beads at 4°C for 1h. The resin beads were loaded into an empty gravity column, followed by washing of the beads with a wash buffer [25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 300 mM KCl and 25 mM imidazole]. Then the proteins were eluted with an elution buffer [25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM KCl and 250 mM imidazole). Fractions with relatively pure protein, as observed on an SDS/PAGE gel were pooled together and concentrated. Then the concentrated protein was subjected to size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) using a Superdex 75pg 16/600 column (GE Healthcare). The fractions from the second peak were collected and concentrated. Finally, the concentrated protein was once again passed through a Superdex 75pg 16/600 column, and the purified protein fractions were pooled together and concentrated. The concentrated protein was stored at −80°C. Similarly, the mutant FtsE proteins were also purified (Supplementary Figure S2A).
The 3D structure of FtsEEc was made using a homology modeling technique. We used the Phyre2 template-based modeling  to model the structure of FtsEEc. The modeling was done in intensive mode using FtsEEc protein sequence. Further, for atomic-level protein structure refinement, we used Fragment guided MD simulation  using an online interface of FG-MD (https://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/FG-MD/). The model quality was further assessed by Ramachandran plot analysis using Phyre2 interface and RAMPAGE . To further validate the correctness of the model, we used two other online homology modeling tools, including I-TASSER  and LOMETS [12,13]. All the structures were visualized and analyzed by PyMOL.
The ATPase assay was performed using Malachite Green Method as described earlier . A 100-μl reaction mixture was set up with different concentrations (1, 5, and 10 μM) of the FtsE protein and incubated with 10 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM ATP at 37°C for 30 min. The reaction mixture was quenched with 70% perchloric acid (1:10 volume). Then, 950 μl of Malachite Green ammonium molybdate solution was added to 50 μl of the reaction mixture and incubated in the dark for 30 min at room temperature. Then the Pi released was calculated by measuring the absorbance at 650 nm and compared with the standard curve generated with sodium phosphate.
For determining the affinity of FtsE for ATP, 1 μM of MANT-ATP (a fluorescence analog of ATP) was incubated with varying concentrations of FtsE in a buffer containing 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 50 mM KCl and 10 mM MgCl2 . The reaction mixture was excited at 350 nm (the excitation wavelength for MANT-ATP), and the emission spectra were collected in the 380–550 nm wavelength range. Then the change in fluorescence intensity was used to calculate the dissociation constant using a double reciprocal plot .
The stoichiometry of FtsE and ATP was assessed using the continuous variation method. Then the change in mant-ATP fluorescence was observed by increasing the mant-ATP concentration and decreasing the FtsE concentration while keeping the total concentration constant at 1 μM. The reaction was carried out with 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl and 10 mM MgCl2.
Analytical gel-filtration chromatography was carried out with a Superdex 200 increase 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare). The column was pre-equilibrated with a buffer containing 20 mM HEPES (pH 8.0) and 50 mM KCl, and 100 μl of the protein sample was injected and allowed to pass through the column at 4°C with 0.5 ml/min flow rate in the same buffer. For molecular mass estimation of FtsEEc, the standard proteins from the gel-filtration high molecular weight calibration kit (GE Healthcare) were passed through the column in the same buffer at 4°C, and molecular mass of the protein was calculated using Kav values.
The near-UV CD (200–260 nm) spectrum was measured using a Circular Dichroism (CD) spectropolarimeter (JASCO-1500) to analyze the secondary structure content of FtsEEc. The protein samples were diluted into 1× PBS to a concentration of 3 μM. The secondary structure content analysis was measured using CD multivariate SSE analysis option from SpectraManager software supplied with JASCO-1500 spectropolarimeter.
The docking was performed using AutoDock/Vina  with default parameters to get more accurate results. The pdbqt files for protein and ligand preparation and grid box were performed using a graphical user interface of AutoDock tools. AutoDock/Vina was further employed to dock ATP on to the protein, FtsEEc . The program AutoDock/Vina considers both protein and ligand as rigid objects during docking and uses iterated local search global optimizer . A total number of 10 poses were given, and the pose with the lowest binding affinity was extracted and aligned with FtsE to identify the residues involved in the interaction. The lowest binding affinity observed from docking was −8.7 kcal/mol from the first pose and was analyzed for further interpretation.
The thermal stability assay was performed by using FtsE protein purified from Ni-NTA resin. The protein was heated in a dry bath at different temperatures for 10 min. The heated protein samples were centrifuged at 40000×g for 30 min. The supernatant and pellet were separated. To the pellet equal amount of buffer was added, and then both supernatant and pellet were loaded on SDS/PAGE separately and visualized with Coomassie stain.
Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) was used to determine if FtsE interacts with itself following the previously established protocol . The full-length FtsE was cloned in pGBT9 and pGAD424 separately. Both the plasmids were subsequently transferred into competent yeast cells and grown in histidine-deficient media.
For dimerization study, first of all the crude membrane fraction was obtained from E. coli (BL21) cell. The cells were lysed and centrifuged to remove the cytoplasmic proteins and then the pellet was used to isolate the membrane fraction using 0.1% Triton-X. A reaction mixture was set using purified His-FtsE and membrane fraction in the presence and absence of ATP and incubated in the ice for 1 h. Then the mixture was passed through cobalt resin and the eluted fraction was loaded in the SDS/PAGE without boiling, then followed by Western blot with anti-His monoclonal antibody. To check the interaction of FtsE with synthesized FtsX peptide (34 amino acids from cytoplasmic fraction), purified FtsE (10 μM) was incubated with FtsX peptide (20 μM) with 10 mM MgCl2 and in the presence or absence of 2 mM ATP. The reaction mixtures were incubated in ice for 30 min followed by glutaraldehyde cross-linking for another 30 min at room temperature. The samples were checked using an SDS/PAGE (18%).
FtsEX complex is a homolog of ABC-transporter in E. coli . The sequence alignment shows the presence of the conserved consensus sequence (Figure 2A) that confirms FtsE as the NBD in the FtsEX complex. Depending on the types of the TMD present, ABC transporters can function either as an exporter or an importer. However, FtsE neither functions as an exporter nor an importer. To understand how FtsE functions as an NBD, we evaluated its properties in vitro. Previously, FtsE protein from M. tuberculosis was expressed in E. coli and purified using denaturation and renaturation . We followed the similar protocol to purify E. coli-FtsE (FtsEEc). We obtained a good amount of purified protein using this method (Supplementary Figure S1A); however, the refolded FtsE was eluted near to the void volume when passed through an analytical SEC (Superdex 200 10/300 GL) (Supplementary Figure S1B). The CD analysis of the eluted fraction showed a poor secondary structure (data not shown) and very low ATPase activity suggesting non-functional protein (Supplementary Figure S3A). Therefore we modified our protocol to obtain functionally folded FtsE.
In the modified protocol, we used a His-pBAD18 vector system for the controlled expression of FtsE in E. coli C41 strains. The overexpression in this system was induced by 0.01% arabinose (w/v), and a large amount of FtsE was obtained in the soluble fraction. The purification was performed using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography, followed by two rounds of SEC (Figure 1A–C). To confirm the purified protein was FtsE, SDS/PAGE and Western blot was performed (Supplementary Figure S1C,D). In the analytical SEC, FtsE (Figure 4A) eluted as a monomer with an approximate molecular mass of 30.2 kDa (Figure 1D and Supplementary Figure S2B). The CD spectroscopy verified the presence of both α-helices and β-sheets (Supplementary Figure S2C), as predicted by secondary structure prediction tools. Our initial characterization showed that the purified FtsEEc is soluble; it has an intact secondary structure and remains as a monomer. This protein was further used for assessing its biochemical properties.
To study the properties and functions of FtsE in E. coli, we evaluated the FtsE structure computationally. The multiple sequence alignment of FtsEEc showed ∼42% sequence identity with methionine importer, MetNI, from E. coli (strain K12). The other structural homologs of FtsEEc with more than 35% sequence identity include an ABC-transporter MacB from Acinetobacter baumannii (39.3%), a non-canonical ABC-transporter from S. pneumoniae (R6 strain) (36.4%), an ABC-transporter from Aquifex aeolicus (36.3%) and ArtP from Geobacillus stearothermophilus. The sequence alignment reveals that the consensus sequences of ABC-transporter family proteins such as Walker A, Walker B motif, Q-loop, D-loop, H-loop, and the signature motif (LSGGQ) are conserved in FtsEEc (Figure 2A) suggesting FtsEEc as a member of the ABC-transporter family. The structure of FtsEEc was predicted by comparative modeling using Phyre2 prediction server, which showed more than 90% confidence for the secondary structural elements . Further validation of the predicted structure was performed using separate online modeling tools based on different algorithms such as I-TASSER  and LOMETS [12,13]. All the predicted structures showed secondary structures similar to that obtained by Phyre2, and therefore it was used for further analysis.
The structural analysis showed that FtsEEc contains 11 β-sheets and 8 α-helices. The β-strands are present as anti-parallel β-sheets arranged in two halves forming a pocket-like structure with α1 helix inserted inside it. The other α-helices lie on the other half of the structure. The Walker-A motif lies in α1 helix and loop connecting β5 and α1. Whereas, the Walker-B motif lies in the β8 strand (Figure 2A,B). We also observed more number of hydrophobic residues distributed over the surface of FtsE (Figure 2C). A higher distribution of hydrophobic residues over the surface may account for the overall higher stability of FtsEEc protein. Thus, the thermal stability of FtsEEc was checked by heating the protein sample at different temperatures. The data show that FtsE possesses higher thermal stability (Figure 2D), which was also verified using CD-spectroscopy (data not shown). Furthermore, the surface electrostatics distribution of the FtsEEc model showed an even charge distribution on both the faces (Supplementary Figure S2D).
The ABC-transporters shows a conserved architecture, where two TMDs associate with each other to form translocon channel and substrate binding sites. The crystal structure of NBDs in the nucleotide-binding state or the whole transporter shows a symmetrical sandwich dimer, where two nucleotides are bound at the monomer–monomer interface of NBDs . Two alternative models have been proposed for NBDs function; processive clamp or switch model and constant contact model . In the processive clamp model, NBDs undergo a cycle of ATP binding followed by dimer formation, which further follows ATP hydrolysis and NBD dimer dissociation. Alternatively, in constant contact model, the NBDs always remain in the asymmetric state, and only one nucleotide stay tightly bound at a time .
To identify the ATP-binding pattern of FtsEEc and its model of function, we performed fluorescence binding assay. FtsEEc was titrated against MANT-ATP, and the change in fluorescence intensity was used to calculate the dissociation constant. Our results indicated the presence of two binding sites in wildtype FtsE, with a high-affinity site (Kd = 21.5 ± 2.2 nM) and a moderate affinity site (Kd = 1.14 ± 0.24 μM) (Figure 3B). The results clearly showed that, like NBDs, the binding of ATP to FtsEEc is sequential. To verify the same, we determined the stoichiometry of the FtsE–MANT–ATP complex using the continuous variation method. Our result showed that more than one (number) ATP (∼1.5) interacted with FtsE (Figure 3E).
We also assessed the ATPase activity of wildtype, ATP binding-deficient mutants (K41A, C49A) and refolded FtsE in vitro. Wildtype FtsEEc showed an increase in ATPase activity in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 3A). The rate of ATPase activity was found to be 0.14 ± 0.01 nmoles of Pi/nmoles of protein/min for wildtype FtsE. Whereas, the refolded FtsEEc showed much lower ATPase activity compared with the native FtsEEc (Supplementary Figure S3A). When the lysine residue that forms the Walker-A loop (K41 in E. coli FtsE) and binds to ATP was mutated to alanine (FtsEK41A ), the ATPase activity was reduced by 50–90% (Figure 3A). The reduced ATPase activity suggests that mutation at a single site did not abolish the ATPase activity of FtsEEc completely. We also checked the ATP binding affinity for FtsEK41A , and it was found to be much lower than wildtype FtsE (Figure 3C,D). Similarly, mutation of cysteine (C49) to alanine (FtsEC49A ), a residue reported to be involved in FtsE dimerization , showed a decreased ATPase activity (by 30%) compared with the wildtype FtsEEc (Figure 3A). Since cysteine residue is present adjacent to the Walker-A motif, a mutation of cysteine residue may lead to a decrease in the ATP binding and, eventually, ATPase activity.
From ATP-binding and the ATPase assays with wildtype and mutant FtsE, we observed that more than one ATP-binding sites are present in FtsEEc. To further probe whether ATP binds to the same residues as in other NBDs, we docked ATP over the FtsEEc monomer model using Autodock Vina . The docking prediction shows that K41 of the Walker-A motif of FtsEEc monomer is involved in binding with ATP (Supplementary Figure S3C,D) and the corresponding lysine-residue in the Walker-A motif is a conserved residue for ATP-binding in NBDs. Thus, if FtsEEc forms a dimer, two ATP molecules could be present at the dimer interface, where each of the monomers would contribute one nucleotide. To check the possibility of FtsEEc forming a dimer experimentally, we first performed analytical SEC of FtsEEc with ATP and FtsEEc without ATP. SEC result did not show any difference in the elution profile or peak position in both the cases (Figure 4A,B). We also performed glutaraldehyde cross-linking and checked the samples on SDS/PAGE. Here again, FtsEEc , both in the absence and presence of ATP, ran as a monomer and did not show any dimer formation (Figure 4C). We further performed a Y2H assay, which also showed no direct interaction between FtsE monomers (Figure 4E). Thus our results suggested that FtsEEc could not dimerize alone or in the presence of ATP. Next, we aimed to check whether any interacting partners are required for the dimerization of FtsE. FtsZ is known to interact with FtsEEc directly, and thus we performed a glutaraldehyde cross-linking experiment on FtsEEc in the presence of FtsZ and ATP. However, we did not see any FtsE dimers (Figure 4D). From the above results, we summarize that FtsEEc does not form a functional homodimer alone or in the presence of either ATP, FtsZ, or both.
Nevertheless, we could not ignore the possibility of the requirement of its interacting partner, FtsX, for forming a stable dimer. To check this possibility, we incubated His-purified FtsE in the presence of ATP and with the cytoplasmic fraction, or the membrane fraction of E. coli lysate. The sample was subjected to semi-denaturing SDS/PAGE and Western blotting using an anti-His antibody. Interestingly, FtsE showed two bands in SDS/PAGE, one at ∼26 kDa and second at ∼55 kDa, whereas, in the presence of the cytoplasmic fraction, FtsE ran as a monomer (Supplementary Figure S3B). Although the Western blot confirmed the presence of FtsE at both the positions, it did not conclude if the upper band is due to FtsE homodimer or due to the formation of a heterocomplex with any of its membrane partner such as FtsX (Figure 5A). To further confirm the involvement of FtsX, we synthesized a 34-amino acid peptide from the cytoplasmic loop of FtsX (TMD2 to TMD3), and the FtsE dimerization experiment was performed in its presence. Then after glutaraldehyde cross-linking, the samples were run on SDS/PAGE.
Interestingly, we did not observe any FtsE dimer; instead, we found that FtsE and FtsX peptide were interacting with each other and showing a shift in FtsE band to ∼30 kDa size (Figure 5B). Our results indicated that FtsEEc might not homodimerize in in-vitro condition, whereas, it may form a heterocomplex with FtsX even in the absence of ATP. Our results also suggested that FtsE–FtsX interaction is not dependent on ATP. However, the cases may be different during in vivo, and further investigation is required to understand if and how FtsE is forming the dimers.
FtsEX complex is an ABC transporter homolog, where FtsE is the NBD, and FtsX is the TMD. Unlike other ABC transporters, FtsEX is not involved in membrane transportation. The predicted structure of FtsX contains a large extra periplasmic loop suggesting its role in the signaling pathway . During bacterial cell division, this extra periplasmic loop of FtsX interacts with EnvC that activates the amidases A and B and initiates PG hydrolysis at the mid-cell . On the other hand, the ATPase activity of FtsE and its interaction with the cytoplasmic loop of FtsX regulates the PG hydrolysis. FtsEX complex does not transport anything. However, a significant question is whether FtsE functions like an NBD, i.e. whether it forms an active dimer and possesses ATPase activity.
To answer this question, we elucidated the NBD-like functions of FtsEEc in vitro. We initially purified FtsEEc from inclusion bodies by denaturation and refolding. However, analytical-SEC and CD spectroscopy showed that the refolded FtsEEc forms larger aggregates with minimal secondary structures. Thus, FtsE was further purified from the soluble fraction; this protein showed proper secondary structures and did not show any aggregation (Figure 4A, Supplementary Figure S2C). Presence of the hydrophobic residues on the surface can stabilize globular proteins and can increase the thermal stability of a protein . In FtsE, more number of hydrophobic residues appear to be clustered along with polar residues on surface (Supplementary Figure S2D) that may increase its thermal stability. This was also evident from our result that showed higher thermal stability for purified FtsE (Figure 2D). The ATPase activity of the purified natively folded FtsE was much higher than that of the refolded FtsE (Supplementary Figure S3A). The homology model of FtsEEc showed an architecture similar to NBDs and suggested that it may form an active dimer (Figure 2B). However, the glutaraldehyde cross-linking, analytical-SEC experiments, and the Y2H assay showed that FtsE does not form any dimer in vitro either in the absence or presence of ATP. Our findings are similar to the results obtained from previous studies where FtsE from S. pneumoniae also did not form an active dimer with glutaraldehyde cross-linking . Thus apart from ATP, FtsE might need its cognate partners FtsX or some other substrate for its dimerization. To verify this, we performed the dimerization of FtsE in the presence of E. coli membrane fraction and ATP.
Interestingly, in the presence of the E. coli membrane fraction, FtsE showed an upper band at the molecular size similar to FtsE homodimer or FtsE–FtsX hetero-complex (Figure 5A). To verify this, we designed a small peptide from the cytoplasmic loop of FtsX and performed the FtsE dimerization experiment. Our result showed that in the in vitro experiment condition, FtsE did not form any dimer, but it interacted with the FtsX-peptide (Figure 5B). This observation suggested that the shift in FtsE band to dimer position in the presence of the E. coli membrane fraction (Figure 5A) might be due to the formation of a hetero-complex of FtsE and FtsX. Our result confirmed that the cytoplasmic loop of FtsX is responsible for FtsE–FtsX interaction, which was initially a prediction.
We also observed that the FtsE–FtsX peptide interaction is not ATP-dependent. Although we were unable to show FtsE dimerization in vitro, it could be possible that our experiment did not mimic the exact required condition for FtsE dimerization. The experiment might require other components like an intact membrane or full-length FtsX. The dimerization of ABC transporters requires two ATP binding sites in each monomer, where the ATPs are shared among the FtsEEc monomers to facilitate the dimerization. Using fluorescence binding assay and Job’s plot assay, we observed that FtsEEc contains more than one ATP binding sites (Figure 3B–E). Lys41 is known to interact with ATP. Our molecular docking results also showed that Lys41 interacts with the three phosphates, similar to shown for other NBDs . However, this FtsE mutant (K41A) still showed some ATPase activity, that further supports the presence of two ATP-binding sites in FtsE. In wildtype FtsE, we observed the presence of two ATP binding sites, one with higher affinity (25 nM) and another with a moderate affinity (1 μM). As Lys41 is the primary residue, we observed from our docking results, and from literature, we assumed that the higher affinity site is for lysine residue from the walker-A motif and moderate site is for serine residue from the signature motif. Considering this hypothesis, we initially expected a moderate affinity (1 μM) for the FtsEK41A mutant. Unfortunately, we could not calculate the exact affinity of FtsEK41A for ATP, as we could not achieve higher protein concentration due to its extensive sticky behavior. However, from the fluorescence binding experiment, we observed it to have weaker affinity compared with wildtype FtsE. The probable reason for this might be, binding of ATP at lysine residue enhances the second ATP binding affinity for serine residue. Thus the mutation of Lys41 to alanine could further reduce the affinity of FtsE for ATP at the second binding site Ser139. This could be the probable reason for not seeing the moderate binding of ATP in the FtsEK41A mutant.
Our study indicated that, like other NBDs, FtsEEc also contains two ATP-binding sites and follows the ATPase cycle. The ATPase cycle and its interaction with FtsE probably are regulating the PG hydrolysis at the mid cell by controlling the on/off switch of the amidases activation.
All supporting data are included within the main article and its supplementary files.
The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.
This work was supported by the Department of Biotechnology, India [grant number BT/PR21546/BRB/10/1560/2016 (to T.K.B.)]; and core funding from the Institute of Life Sciences.
S.M. and T.K.B. designed the experiments. S.M. executed all the biochemical experiments. A.K. performed homology modeling, molecular docking, and CD spectroscopy experiments. H.D. and C.A. helped in gene cloning and protein purification work. S.M., A.K., D.V., and T.K.B. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript.
|FtsEEc||Escherichia coli FtsE|